Skip to content

Conversation

@rubensworks
Copy link
Member

@rubensworks rubensworks commented Jan 13, 2026

In the SPARQL Update spec, we need to reference the RDF dataset merge definition. This PR adds an id for this definition, so we can properly reference it.

(requested reviews from the editors of both the RDF 1.2 Semantics and SPARQL 1.2 Update specs)

Closes w3c/sparql-update#51


Preview | Diff

In the SPARQL Update spec, we need to reference the RDF dataset merge definition.
This PR adds an id for this definition, so we can properly reference it.

Closes w3c/sparql-update#51
@rubensworks rubensworks added the spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2) label Jan 13, 2026
@afs afs self-requested a review January 13, 2026 10:26
spec/index.html Outdated
(adding in empty graphs as required).</p>

<table>
<table id="dfn-rdf-dataset">
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

RDF Dataset is defined in RDF Concepts.
This causes the echidna error.

https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf12-concepts/#dfn-rdf-dataset

SPARQL Query uses the same algebraic formulation as semantics and the box there does not say "Definition".

https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql12-query/#sparqlDataset

RDF Semantics should not be claiming to define it. As it seems the current semantics doc is being read as defining RDF dataset, maybe the table text could changed be "RDF dataset" to avoid this confusion.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll remove the id here. Maybe we can create a separate issue for updating the text?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR #172.

Copy link
Contributor

@pfps pfps left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that this is OK now.

@afs
Copy link
Contributor

afs commented Jan 23, 2026

Editors - please can you merge this PR? It puts a id= on the definition of table for dataset merge, which means that SPARQL Update can link to it. It makes no other changes.

@pfps
Copy link
Contributor

pfps commented Jan 23, 2026

@franconi Does this conflict with the other PRs?

@afs
Copy link
Contributor

afs commented Jan 23, 2026

It's adjacent to a diff on #178 so git may declare a conflict but one that is simple to resolve.

@pfps
Copy link
Contributor

pfps commented Jan 23, 2026

OK, I'll merge it.

@pfps pfps merged commit b42d25e into main Jan 23, 2026
2 checks passed
</table>

<table>
<table id="dfn-rdf-dataset-merge">
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As this is the only change made by this PR, its title should change from

Add id to dataset and dataset merge definitions

to

Add id to definition of RDF dataset merge

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Broken links in SPARQL 1.2 Update

7 participants