Test Build #878
Test Build #878
Conversation
![wso2-engineering[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1856828?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| log.debug("Regulatory property missing. Treating as non-regulatory application."); | ||
| log.debug("Test build."); | ||
| return false; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Log Improvement Suggestion No: 1
| log.debug("Regulatory property missing. Treating as non-regulatory application."); | |
| log.debug("Test build."); | |
| return false; | |
| log.debug("Regulatory property missing. Treating as non-regulatory application."); | |
| log.debug("Test build."); | |
| log.info("Client ID: {} treated as non-regulatory application due to missing property", clientId); | |
| return false; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
AI Agent Log Improvement Checklist
- The log-related comments and suggestions in this review were generated by an AI tool to assist with identifying potential improvements. Purpose of reviewing the code for log improvements is to improve the troubleshooting capabilities of our products.
- Please make sure to manually review and validate all suggestions before applying any changes. Not every code suggestion would make sense or add value to our purpose. Therefore, you have the freedom to decide which of the suggestions are helpful.
✅ Before merging this pull request:
- Review all AI-generated comments for accuracy and relevance.
- Complete and verify the table below. We need your feedback to measure the accuracy of these suggestions and the value they add. If you are rejecting a certain code suggestion, please mention the reason briefly in the suggestion for us to capture it.
| Comment | Accepted (Y/N) | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| #### Log Improvement Suggestion No: 1 |
WalkthroughA debug logging statement is added to the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
financial-services-accelerator/components/org.wso2.financial.services.accelerator.identity.extensions/src/main/java/org/wso2/financial/services/accelerator/identity/extensions/util/IdentityCommonUtils.java(1 hunks)
| return Boolean.parseBoolean(regulatoryProperty.toString()); | ||
| } else { | ||
| log.debug("Regulatory property missing. Treating as non-regulatory application."); | ||
| log.debug("Test build."); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove temporary debug statement before merging.
The log statement log.debug("Test build.") provides no diagnostic or contextual value and appears to be leftover test code. Debug logs should convey meaningful information about application state or behavior.
A previous review comment on lines 381-383 already suggested improving the logging in this section by adding an log.info statement that includes the clientId for better traceability. Consider implementing that suggestion instead.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
financial-services-accelerator/components/org.wso2.financial/services/accelerator/identity/extensions/src/main/java/org/wso2/financial/services/accelerator/identity/extensions/util/IdentityCommonUtils.java
around line 382, remove the temporary debug statement log.debug("Test build.");
and replace it with a meaningful log call (e.g., log.info or log.debug as
appropriate) that includes the clientId and context to improve traceability;
ensure the message follows existing logging conventions and does not expose
sensitive data.
1 participant
Pull Request Title
Issue link: required
Doc Issue: Optional, link issue from documentation repository
Applicable Labels: Spec, product, version, type (specify requested labels)
Development Checklist
Testing Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.