Feat(eos_designs): Add support for ipv6 addresses in l3_interfaces in network_services

[Shivani-gslab]

Change Summary

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #3331 #6767

Component(s) name

arista.avd.eos_designs

Proposed changes

How to test

Checklist

User Checklist

• N/A

Repository Checklist

• My code has been rebased from devel before I start
• I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
• My change requires a change to the documentation and documentation have been updated accordingly.
• I have updated molecule CI testing accordingly. (check the box if not applicable)

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Added ipv6_addresses support for network-services L3 interfaces and L3 port-channels (including dual-stack).
  • Added ipv6_acl_in / ipv6_acl_out with interface_ip-based substitution, and automatic IPv6 routing activation when IPv6 is configured.
• Bug Fixes
  • IPv6-only L3 interfaces are now included in generation.
• Documentation
  • Updated schema tables and examples for IPv6 addressing and IPv6 ACLs.
• Tests
  • Expanded unit and negative test fixtures for IPv6 validation (e.g., length-mismatch and missing-field cases).

[github-actions]

Review docs on Read the Docs

To test this pull request:

# Create virtual environment for this testing below the current directory
python -m venv test-avd-pr-6876
# Activate the virtual environment
source test-avd-pr-6876/bin/activate
# Install all requirements including PyAVD
pip install "pyavd[ansible] @ git+https://github.com/Shivani-gslab/avd.git@l3_interfaces_ipv6_n/w_services#subdirectory=python-avd" --force
# Point Ansible collections path to the Python virtual environment
export ANSIBLE_COLLECTIONS_PATH=$VIRTUAL_ENV/ansible_collections
# Install Ansible collection
python -m ansible.cli.galaxy collection install git+https://github.com/Shivani-gslab/avd.git#/ansible_collections/arista/avd/,l3_interfaces_ipv6_n/w_services --force
cd test-avd-pr-6876
# Run your playbook using `python -m ansible.cli.playbook path/to/playbook.yml ...`

You can also test this PR using AVD playground:

• Rebase your branch to makes sure it is up-to-date and has latest lab topologies for example inventories
• Authenticate on labs.arista.com. Use your email! Not login.
• Start the playground
• In the lab selector UI pick "I want to use a specific AVD fork"
• Enter following parameters:

GitHub org: Shivani-gslab
Repository name: avd
Branch: l3_interfaces_ipv6_n/w_services

• Select an example inventory to test the PR
• Once the AVD Playground setup will be finished, type make start and test anything once the lab is up

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 98.97959% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 92.07%. Comparing base (6eb920d) to head (5b257f2).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...config/network_services/port_channel_interfaces.py	97.50%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #6876      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.06%   92.07%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         775      775              
  Lines       42376    42427      +51     
  Branches    10223    10232       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits        39012    39066      +54     
+ Misses       1955     1953       -2     
+ Partials     1409     1408       -1     

Components	Coverage Δ
pyavd	93.90% <98.97%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
schema_tools	68.67% <ø> (ø)
Ansible plugins	77.03% <ø> (ø)

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...yavd/_eos_designs/shared_utils/filtered_tenants.py	92.78% <100.00%> (ø)
...red_config/network_services/ethernet_interfaces.py	95.75% <100.00%> (+3.78%)	⬆️
...designs/structured_config/network_services/vrfs.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...config/network_services/port_channel_interfaces.py	99.20% <97.50%> (-0.80%)	⬇️

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[github-actions]

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

[github-actions]

Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

[github-actions]

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

[MaheshGSLAB]

Minor comments, reset looks good to me

[alexeygorbunov]

Still LGTM (with 1 new commit since last approval)

all comments have been addressed

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
2 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud