Skip to content

[circuits] swap_bytes circuit gadget builder#900

Closed
jimpo wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
09-01-_circuits_swap_bytes_circuit_gadget_builder
Closed

[circuits] swap_bytes circuit gadget builder#900
jimpo wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
09-01-_circuits_swap_bytes_circuit_gadget_builder

Conversation

@jimpo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@jimpo jimpo commented Sep 1, 2025

Efficient circuit gadget for swapping bytes in a word

Efficient circuit gadget for swapping bytes in a word
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

jimpo commented Sep 1, 2025


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add the label merge-ready to this PR to add it to the merge queue.

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@graphite-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown

graphite-app bot commented Sep 1, 2025

Merge activity

  • Sep 1, 8:46 PM UTC: jimpo added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
  • Sep 1, 8:46 PM UTC: CI is running for this pull request on a draft pull request (#903) due to your merge queue CI optimization settings.
  • Sep 1, 8:53 PM UTC: Merged by the Graphite merge queue via draft PR: #903.

graphite-app bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2025
Efficient circuit gadget for swapping bytes in a word
@graphite-app graphite-app bot closed this Sep 1, 2025
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 09-01-_circuits_swap_bytes_circuit_gadget_builder branch September 1, 2025 20:53
lockedloop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
Efficient circuit gadget for swapping bytes in a word
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants