-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
mujoco: Add support for Universal and Screw Joints #980
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5c50dc1
mujoco: Add Universal Joint support
azeey c384d4c
mujoco: Add Screw Joint support
azeey 590534a
fix style errors
azeey c7e2e1a
test: Decouple new joint tests from test.world using self-contained S…
azeey f98e393
Fix how screw joint limits are handled
azeey 40ff6fa
Revert changes to bullet-featherstone and skip DOF checks for it
azeey ca30b39
fix: Support Screw joint degrees of freedom query in MuJoCo
azeey 4803351
Address reviewer feedback
azeey 8f4e576
refactor: Extract and document screw thread pitch helper in SDFFeatures
azeey 3a00189
Use ValidateDofParam in dartsim
azeey 0bce453
refactor: Zero-initialize equality constraint data using std::fill
azeey 8c9388a
Refactor joint equality constraint resolution for MuJoCo screw joints
azeey 451a971
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into azeey/mujoco_more_joi…
azeey 901f576
Address more reviewer feedback
azeey 4369df6
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into azeey/mujoco_more_joi…
azeey 55402fa
Address reviewer feedback
azeey File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just checking: Adding the two joints together will make
GetDegreesOfFreedom()return 2 instead of 1?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch! I added a test in ca30b39 and it failed. I ended up storing the number of equality constraints in
JointInfoas you suggested in your review below and used that to subtract from the DOF computed by MuJoCo.