Skip to content

Sequential Box<>Box #208

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

camevor
Copy link
Collaborator

@camevor camevor commented Apr 30, 2025

This is a reimplementation of box<>box, based on the mjc code rather than the mjx code. It is sequential and does not make use of tiles, but closer to mjc and may lead to lower thread divergence.

It fixes issues observed in #163

@camevor camevor marked this pull request as ready for review May 7, 2025 12:15
Copy link
Collaborator

@erikfrey erikfrey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good! Just one nit and we'll merge.

@@ -1718,6 +1730,497 @@ def capsule_box(
)


@wp.func
def compute_rotmore(face_idx: int) -> wp.mat33:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: let's prepend the name with an underscore as we probably don't expect others to use this outside this module, no?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants