Skip to content

Conversation

@JPGC04
Copy link
Member

@JPGC04 JPGC04 commented Oct 11, 2025

No description provided.

Rain1618
Rain1618 previously approved these changes Oct 12, 2025
@nadimasmar nadimasmar changed the title Update UnityState.msg to sync with AUV-2026 hydrophone messages Update custom messages to sync with AUV-2026 message definitions Oct 12, 2025
veronikaslobo
veronikaslobo previously approved these changes Oct 18, 2025
@JPGC04 JPGC04 dismissed stale reviews from veronikaslobo and WilliamZhang2205 via 5539a47 October 18, 2025 17:59
@JPGC04
Copy link
Member Author

JPGC04 commented Oct 25, 2025

This was tested with auv-sim-unity on branch custom_messages_change. It works but I noticed the red (auv belief) was lagging and I am guessing it was the computer not able to process sensor messages as fast as needed.

Copy link
Contributor

@Alb33rt Alb33rt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes make sense to match more in-line with ROS definitions and conventions. The embedded enum approach might change, but only to a less complex case. Code logic changes make sense.

Copy link
Member

@nadimasmar nadimasmar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is the issue of AUV belief in the sim drifting rapidly on this branch. Whether the cause of the problem is change to AUV-2025 or the sim-unity code, we should resolve it before merging

@thirteenlizards thirteenlizards self-requested a review November 1, 2025 21:26
Copy link

@thirteenlizards thirteenlizards left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Commit corresponding to mcgill-robotics/auv-embedded-2026#191 "Updated ros_lib library"

Merge not currently needed, using this branch on its own for now with corresponding embedded branch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants