-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 124
fix: buildQueryOptions error #3132
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: 10-08-fix_railway_connect_form
Are you sure you want to change the base?
fix: buildQueryOptions error #3132
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
2 Skipped Deployments
|
Warning This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
How to use the Graphite Merge QueueAdd the label merge-queue to this PR to add it to the merge queue. You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link. An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository. Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue. This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
Claude encountered an error —— View job I'll analyze this and get back to you. |
commit: |
Graphite Automations"Test" took an action on this PR • (10/08/25)1 assignee was added to this PR based on Kacper Wojciechowski's automation. |
c3abe3e
to
f784f10
Compare
8662f05
to
dbd3c7a
Compare
Claude encountered an error —— View job I'll analyze this and get back to you. |
Claude encountered an error —— View job I'll analyze this and get back to you. |
f784f10
to
366f8f7
Compare
dbd3c7a
to
d55922f
Compare
Claude encountered an error —— View job I'll analyze this and get back to you. |
Claude encountered an error —— View job I'll analyze this and get back to you. |
366f8f7
to
a7fc94f
Compare
d55922f
to
a82585b
Compare
Claude encountered an error —— View job I'll analyze this and get back to you. |
Claude encountered an error —— View job I'll analyze this and get back to you. |
a82585b
to
e0096df
Compare
a7fc94f
to
20b6f95
Compare
Claude encountered an error —— View job I'll analyze this and get back to you. |
Claude encountered an error —— View job I'll analyze this and get back to you. |
20b6f95
to
17a4dbf
Compare
e0096df
to
0ab7942
Compare
Claude encountered an error —— View job I'll analyze this and get back to you. |
Claude encountered an error —— View job I'll analyze this and get back to you. |
Closes FRONT-838
TL;DR
Hide the "Instances" section in the sidebar when the data provider doesn't support query options.
What changed?
Added a check to verify if the data provider has the
buildsQueryOptions
capability before rendering the "Instances" section in both the Subnav and CloudSidebarContent components. This prevents displaying the Instances section when it's not applicable.How to test?
Why make this change?
Some data providers don't support query options, making the "Instances" section irrelevant for those providers. This change improves the UI by only showing relevant navigation options based on the capabilities of the connected data provider.