Skip to content

Conversation

@adam-a-a
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes/Resolves:

Summary/Motivation:

Fix circular import bettween lsrro flowsheet and multi_sweep.

Changes proposed in this PR:

-Fix circular import bettween lsrro flowsheet and multi_sweep.

  • speed up tests with quick start

Legal Acknowledgement

By contributing to this software project, I agree to the following terms and conditions for my contribution:

  1. I agree my contributions are submitted under the license terms described in the LICENSE.txt file at the top level of this directory.
  2. I represent I am authorized to make the contributions and grant the license. If my employer has rights to intellectual property that includes these contributions, I represent that I have received permission to make contributions and grant the required license on behalf of that employer.

Comment on lines +1831 to +1833
has_NaCl_solubility_limit=True,
has_calculated_concentration_polarization=has_CP,
has_calculated_ro_pressure_drop=True,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this really should be updated to match what was specified in run_lsrro_case

Comment on lines +1844 to +1846
set_default_bounds_on_module_dimensions=True,
A_value=A_value,
permeate_quality_limit=permeate_quality_limit,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should also make sure this aligns with what user provided up front

@ksbeattie ksbeattie added the Priority:High High Priority Issue or PR label Dec 4, 2025
@kurbansitterley
Copy link
Contributor

@adam-a-a do you want to memorialize the additional changes you wanted to make in this PR in an issue if we want to merge this now?

@adam-a-a
Copy link
Contributor Author

adam-a-a commented Dec 6, 2025

@kurbansitterley thanks for the reminder. The additional changes desired are tied to #1644 which in turn leads to other suggested changes stemming from #1629

@adam-a-a adam-a-a marked this pull request as ready for review December 10, 2025 15:04
@adam-a-a adam-a-a requested a review from bknueven as a code owner December 10, 2025 15:04
@sufikaur sufikaur merged commit c8da2e8 into watertap-org:main Dec 11, 2025
18 checks passed
sufikaur added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Priority:High High Priority Issue or PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants