CCPP Framework Meeting Minutes 2025 02 05

Agenda

• GitHub issues/PRs
• New items
• Updates
• Other business
• notes

---

Attendees: Cheryl Craig, Michael Kavulich, Dom Heinzeller, Michael Waxmonsky, Jesse Nusbaumer, RhaeSung Kim, Courtney Peverley

GitHub issues/PRs

CCPP Framework (issues, PRs, discussions)

• Add support and testing for equivalent units #571

• Enable multiple schemes to use the same local name for different variables #621

  • Any updates?

• Constituent index lookup #622

  • Approved, but looks like Steve was still going to make some changes?

• unit testing? Discussion#623

• MPI interface for CCPP physics schemes Issue#624

• Bugfix for unpromoted ddt-type scalar variables #626

• Allow for multiple instances of local_name in Cap. Issue#630

  • Capgen in SCM: Multiple instances of local_name in Group Cap #631

• Sub-cycling not working properly Issue#632

  • Capgen in SCM: Fix to allow for scheme subcycling. #633

• Suite-part list is wrong Issue#634

• Add diagnostic_name metadata field Issue#635

• Allow for differing module/file names Issue#636

  • Capgen in SCM: Differing source and module name #637

• Pass DDT subfields into Group Caps. Issue#639

  • Capgen in SCM: DDT subfields into Group Caps #640

• Code Valor: high-impact violation in ccpp_prebuild code generator Issue#641

  • ccpp_prebuild.py: remove execute function from common.py, clean files the Python way #642

Drafts

• Testing refactor #612
  • Continued discussion

Standard names (issues, PRs, discussions)

• add emissions names #86

  • Just need one final update from Jerome and then ready to merge.

• Second rules update in v1 branch, update names, update write_standard_name_table.py to allow for subsections #87

  • Comments addressed, waiting for feedback

New items for discussion

Updates from last time

Previous notes

Other business

Offer suggestions/comments on development workflow rules:

• https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iMh_iKsUrB_mOMF6lGkFggG85JV62NFkTjKJboqWvV8/edit?tab=t.0

Meeting notes

CCPP Framework

Standard Names

Discussion