-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
CCPP Framework Meeting Minutes 2025 02 13
Michael Kavulich edited this page Feb 13, 2025
·
4 revisions
Attendees: Michael Kavulich,
CCPP Framework (issues, PRs, discussions)
-
Enable multiple schemes to use the same local name for different variables #621
- Any updates?
-
- Approved, but still unresolved comments.
-
Sub-cycling not working properly Issue#632, Suite-part list is wrong Issue#634
-
Capgen in SCM: Fix to allow for scheme subcycling. #633
- Ready for review!
-
Capgen in SCM: Fix to allow for scheme subcycling. #633
-
Allow for differing module/file names Issue#636
-
Capgen in SCM: Differing source and module name #637
- Approved, but needs updates. Did anyone else want to review?
-
Capgen in SCM: Differing source and module name #637
-
- Continued updates and discussion
Standard names (issues, PRs, discussions)
-
- Merged.
-
- Still need some discussion
Brian Dobbins has started testing the Intel compiler limit problem, and will be attending the beginning of the meeting, so it might be good to discuss this issue first if possible.
Updated branch rules:
- For
main, Added "Dismiss stale pull request approvals when new commits are pushed" and increased number of required reviews to 3 (to match number of regtests) - For
develop, Added "Require linear history" (which prevents merge commits to that branch specifically). This allows me to re-enable merge commits as an option, but creates a potentially confusing message on PRs where merge commit is the default.
Offer suggestions/comments on development workflow rules:
- Latest updates were applied: https://github.com/NCAR/ccpp-framework/wiki/Development-Workflow
- New comments and suggestions here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iMh_iKsUrB_mOMF6lGkFggG85JV62NFkTjKJboqWvV8/edit?tab=t.0
CCPP Framework
Standard Names
Discussion