fix(design): align the evaluator node designs with the packages they describe

[technolojin]

Description

Split of #13298 — the evaluator slice. Three classes of fix.

1. Fixed-name interfaces declared as remap targets

A port pinned with global: connects outside the design graph on a fixed topic: link_manager skips any connection whose target is a global input port, and the exporter emits no remap. With remap_target: the port takes part in the graph like any other, while the launcher still binds it to the official name.

Converted across autoware_evaluation_adapter (AutowareEngage, VelocityLimit — their operation mode, velocity limit and external API service ports), autoware_perception_online_evaluator (the two latency inputs) and autoware_scenario_simulator_v2_adapter (MetricConverter's three metric inputs and its overall diagnostics output). /diagnostics stays global:.

2. Launch fields and interface types that do not match the package

design	field	was	is
ControlEvaluator	plugin	autoware::control_evaluator::ControlEvaluatorNode	control_diagnostics::ControlEvaluatorNode
ControlEvaluator	metrics	autoware_control_msgs/msg/ControlEvaluation (no such type)	tier4_metric_msgs/msg/MetricArray
PlanningEvaluator	metrics	autoware_planning_msgs/msg/PlanningAnalysis (no such type)	tier4_metric_msgs/msg/MetricArray

AutowareEngage and VelocityLimit are components registered with RCLCPP_COMPONENTS_REGISTER_NODE and build no executable of their own, so their executable: field is dropped.

3. ControlEvaluator planning factor inputs

The eleven planning factor subscribers are pinned to their /planning/planning_factors/* topics via remap_target; merge_from_private and no_drivable_lane were missing from the design entirely.

Related links

Parent Issue:

• None

Related:

• fix(design): align the node designs with the packages they describe #13298 — the umbrella PR this is split from
• feat(autoware_sample_designs): compose the AD API, system and vehicle components from design modules autoware_launch#1976 — the launch counterpart; the reference system was built and run against this PR together with it
• fix(control, planning): connect the module inputs left without a source autoware_launch#1972 — the matching module connections

How was this PR tested?

• pre-commit run --files on all six changed designs (Autoware System Design Format lint, prettier, yamllint) passes.
• Launch fields re-checked against CMakeLists.txt and RCLCPP_COMPONENTS_REGISTER_NODE; interface types against the installed .msg definitions and the create_publisher / create_subscription call sites.
• The changes are byte-identical to the corresponding files on fix(design): align the node designs with the packages they describe #13298, which was validated by an autoware_sample_designs deployment build across four modes.
• The AutowareSample reference system was built and run with these designs against feat(autoware_sample_designs): compose the AD API, system and vehicle components from design modules autoware_launch#1976: colcon build --packages-select autoware_sample_designs succeeds with zero warnings and exports all four modes (Runtime, LoggingSimulation, PlanningSimulation, E2ESimulation), and planning simulation reaches autonomous mode.

Notes for reviewers

Design metadata only; no launch file or node source is touched.

Interface changes

None. The added ControlEvaluator subscribers are topics the node already subscribes to.

Effects on system behavior

None.

[github-actions]

Thank you for contributing to the Autoware project!

🚧 If your pull request is in progress, switch it to draft mode.

Please ensure:

• You've checked our contribution guidelines.
• Your PR follows our pull request guidelines.
• All required CI checks pass before marking the PR ready for review.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 20.48%. Comparing base (f540393) to head (60954f2).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #13341      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   20.49%   20.48%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1948     1948              
  Lines      137202   137201       -1     
  Branches    48933    48932       -1     
==========================================
- Hits        28113    28107       -6     
+ Misses      86314    86313       -1     
- Partials    22775    22781       +6     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
daily	?
full-suite	20.48% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️	Carriedforward from f540393

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.