Skip to content

Fix: Remove unused parameter from RelayQueueEngine #681

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pniedzielski
Copy link
Collaborator

During the fixes relating to monolithic storage, we left an unused parameter in RelayQueueEngine::storePush originally denoting whether the push was out-of-order or not. This is no longer needed, so this patch removes the parameter.

Issue number of the reported bug or feature request: #

Describe your changes
A clear and concise description of the changes you have made.

Testing performed
Describe the testing you have performed to ensure that the bug has been addressed, or that the new feature works as planned.

Additional context
Add any other context about your contribution here.

@pniedzielski pniedzielski force-pushed the fix/out-of-order-push-argument branch from e616419 to 36b92f6 Compare April 3, 2025 21:23
@pniedzielski pniedzielski marked this pull request as ready for review April 3, 2025 22:43
@pniedzielski pniedzielski requested a review from a team as a code owner April 3, 2025 22:43
@pniedzielski pniedzielski requested a review from dorjesinpo April 3, 2025 22:43
During the fixes relating to monolithic storage, we left an unused
parameter in `RelayQueueEngine::storePush` originally denoting whether
the push was out-of-order or not.  This is no longer needed, so this
patch removes the parameter.

Signed-off-by: Patrick M. Niedzielski <[email protected]>
@pniedzielski pniedzielski force-pushed the fix/out-of-order-push-argument branch from 36b92f6 to 924ba24 Compare April 4, 2025 19:54
@pniedzielski
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@dorjesinpo this is low priority, but I don't want it to get lost

Copy link
Collaborator

@dorjesinpo dorjesinpo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good. My only concern, there is some possibility of using isOutOfOrder in the last step(s) of Reliable Broadcast. So, we have a choice of removing this and then we need to remove the corresponding if clause in RelayQueueEngine, or keeping this for a while

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants