[core-api][experimental] get_asset_provenance
#26684
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Dec 23, 2024
This was referenced Dec 23, 2024
This was referenced Dec 23, 2024
Base automatically changed from
12-23-_core-api_experimental_assetout_tags
to
12-23-_core-api_experimental_owners_
December 31, 2024 19:24
Base automatically changed from
12-23-_core-api_experimental_owners_
to
12-23-_core-api_experimental_report_runless_asset_event_
December 31, 2024 19:24
Base automatically changed from
12-23-_core-api_experimental_report_runless_asset_event_
to
12-23-_core-api_experimental_exclude_subruns
December 31, 2024 19:24
Base automatically changed from
12-23-_core-api_experimental_exclude_subruns
to
12-23-_core-api_experimental_build_reconstructable_job_
December 31, 2024 19:25
Base automatically changed from
12-23-_core-api_experimental_build_reconstructable_job_
to
12-23-_core-api_experimental_source_code_metadata
December 31, 2024 19:25
Base automatically changed from
12-23-_core-api_experimental_source_code_metadata
to
12-23-_core-api_experimental_automationconditionsensordefinition
December 31, 2024 19:25
Base automatically changed from
12-23-_core-api_experimental_automationconditionsensordefinition
to
12-23-_core-api_experimental_multi_asset_sensor
December 31, 2024 19:25
Base automatically changed from
12-23-_core-api_experimental_multi_asset_sensor
to
12-23-_core-api_experimental_observeresult
December 31, 2024 19:25
Base automatically changed from
12-23-_core-api_experimental_observeresult
to
12-23-_core-apis_experimental_automationcondition.any_downstream_conditions
December 31, 2024 19:26
Base automatically changed from
12-23-_core-apis_experimental_automationcondition.any_downstream_conditions
to
core-api-audit
December 31, 2024 19:26
OwenKephart
force-pushed
the
core-api-audit
branch
from
efa7c18 to
28e73c5
Compare
OwenKephart
force-pushed
the
12-23-_core-api_experimental_get_asset_provenance_
branch
from
07509f0 to
7611d3a
Compare
smackesey
approved these changes
Jan 2, 2025
OwenKephart
force-pushed
the
core-api-audit
branch
from
28e73c5 to
655ae75
Compare
OwenKephart
force-pushed
the
12-23-_core-api_experimental_get_asset_provenance_
branch
from
7611d3a to
fdd99dc
Compare
OwenKephart
force-pushed
the
core-api-audit
branch
from
655ae75 to
f2e00af
Compare
OwenKephart
force-pushed
the
12-23-_core-api_experimental_get_asset_provenance_
branch
2 times, most recently
from
8f05c61 to
6b1aae6
Compare
OwenKephart
changed the base branch from
core-api-audit
to
12-23-_core-api_experimental_placeholder_create_beta_decorator
OwenKephart
force-pushed
the
12-23-_core-api_experimental_get_asset_provenance_
branch
from
6b1aae6 to
d243e7e
Compare
OwenKephart
changed the base branch from
12-23-_core-api_experimental_placeholder_create_beta_decorator
to
core-api-audit
maximearmstrong
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2025
OwenKephart
force-pushed
the
core-api-audit
branch
from
f2e00af to
7a526b2
Compare
OwenKephart
force-pushed
the
12-23-_core-api_experimental_get_asset_provenance_
branch
from
d243e7e to
74478c0
Compare
## Summary & Motivation decision: experimental -> beta reason: this requires a final pass on our end to feel comfortable marking as GA, but I think it is worth doing in the near future as this is a powerful feature docs exist: no (will need to) ## How I Tested These Changes ## Changelog > Insert changelog entry or delete this section.
OwenKephart
deleted the
12-23-_core-api_experimental_get_asset_provenance_
branch
OwenKephart
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2025
## Summary & Motivation decision: experimental -> public (uncertain) reason: this has existed for years without change. even if this is not a commonly-used API, we should probably just make the call that we're not changing it at this point docs exist: yes (api only, which is ok) ## How I Tested These Changes ## Changelog > Insert changelog entry or delete this section.
OwenKephart
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2025
## Summary & Motivation decision: experimental -> public (uncertain) reason: this has existed for years without change. even if this is not a commonly-used API, we should probably just make the call that we're not changing it at this point docs exist: yes (api only, which is ok) ## How I Tested These Changes ## Changelog > Insert changelog entry or delete this section.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary & Motivation
decision: experimental -> public (uncertain)
reason: this has existed for years without change. even if this is not a commonly-used API, we should probably just make the call that we're not changing it at this point
docs exist: yes (api only, which is ok)
How I Tested These Changes
Changelog