Skip to content

Comments

Jewish Calendar quality scale#143763

Merged
joostlek merged 15 commits intohome-assistant:devfrom
tsvi:jcal-qs
Sep 10, 2025
Merged

Jewish Calendar quality scale#143763
joostlek merged 15 commits intohome-assistant:devfrom
tsvi:jcal-qs

Conversation

@tsvi
Copy link
Contributor

@tsvi tsvi commented Apr 27, 2025

Proposed change

Depends on:

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New integration (thank you!)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • This PR is related to issue:
  • Link to documentation pull request:
  • Link to developer documentation pull request:
  • Link to frontend pull request:

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • I have followed the perfect PR recommendations
  • The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format homeassistant tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
    Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
    Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

Copy link
Member

@joostlek joostlek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we get this PR in a state where it doesn't depend on other PRs so we can improve the state in those PRs?

@home-assistant home-assistant bot marked this pull request as draft July 9, 2025 20:31
@home-assistant
Copy link

home-assistant bot commented Jul 9, 2025

Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍

Learn more about our pull request process.

@tsvi
Copy link
Contributor Author

tsvi commented Jul 9, 2025

Actually, I'm not sure we need the coordinator as part of the quality scale, so I think we can start looking at the various points and decide whether we're ready here.
I'm not sure why I added the coordinator as a dependency.

@tsvi tsvi marked this pull request as ready for review July 9, 2025 21:26
@home-assistant home-assistant bot requested a review from joostlek July 9, 2025 21:26
Copy link
Member

@joostlek joostlek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's add the things we agree on to fix to todo and add the comments to the list and then we can merge and improve from there

appropriate-polling: done
brands: done
common-modules: done
config-flow-test-coverage: done
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we test that the option flow refreshes the entry?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Refreshes" meaning that the updated values are taken into consideration?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

config-flow: done
dependency-transparency: done
docs-actions: done
docs-high-level-description: done
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we can remove the
image
parenthesis here

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment on lines +31 to +32
docs-configuration-parameters: done
docs-installation-parameters: done
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's a neat table you can use to format this, now everything is their own header

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@home-assistant home-assistant bot marked this pull request as draft July 9, 2025 21:48
@tsvi tsvi mentioned this pull request Jul 13, 2025
19 tasks
@tsvi tsvi marked this pull request as ready for review August 11, 2025 22:03
@home-assistant home-assistant bot requested a review from joostlek August 11, 2025 22:03
@tsvi
Copy link
Contributor Author

tsvi commented Aug 11, 2025

I think we're left with a single comment regarding the options flow test. @joostlek could you clarify what you meant by that? And if anything else is needed?

@joostlek joostlek merged commit 8367930 into home-assistant:dev Sep 10, 2025
34 checks passed
@tsvi tsvi deleted the jcal-qs branch September 11, 2025 14:09
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 12, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants