-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
[core-api][experimental] Definitions.get_all_asset_specs, Definitions.with_reconstruction_metadata #26705
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+5
−5
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Dec 23, 2024
This was referenced Dec 23, 2024
042185a
to
d096946
Compare
991c6c0
to
73e3a15
Compare
yuhan
previously requested changes
Dec 26, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
are we using/recommending this anywhere? just looking at the code and pr summary, this looks a little busted. so should we mark it as "Preview"?
Merged
d096946
to
beab8e1
Compare
73e3a15
to
9712a54
Compare
beab8e1
to
490e571
Compare
9712a54
to
b1446c6
Compare
d00d951
to
9d0fffe
Compare
b1446c6
to
2487afe
Compare
updated! |
9d0fffe
to
3a73704
Compare
2487afe
to
bb9ad96
Compare
ffa35ac
to
4fc73c3
Compare
bb9ad96
to
adea27f
Compare
maximearmstrong
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2025
…s.with_reconstruction_metadata
4fc73c3
to
dfedc60
Compare
adea27f
to
0245369
Compare
…26709) ## Summary & Motivation decision: experimental -> beta reason: this is an unfortunate case where a fairly-new option actually ended up needing to reference the superseded repository API. we should fix that before making this GA (and this is a fairly niche option) docs exist: n/a ## How I Tested These Changes ## Changelog > Insert changelog entry or delete this section.
ea1d6a5
into
12-23-_core-api_experimental_custom_path_fs_io_manager_
1 check was pending
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary & Motivation
decision: experimental -> beta
reason: these seem a bit more speculative --
get_all_asset_specs()
has somewhat unituitive behavior asDefinitions(assets=[AssetSpec("a", deps="b")]).get_all_asset_specs()
actually returns two specs. the reconstruction metadata bit also feels subject to change in the futuredocs exist: n/a
How I Tested These Changes
Changelog